Epiphanyblog

All about ideas…

End. Corporate Welfare. Now!

leave a comment »

The current Senate Financial Reform bill appears not to be reform at all. I’ve been following the negotiations as they continue, and I’m less and less optimistic that any real reform will come out of the Senate. I’m surprised that Senator Dodd, who is leaving the Senate at the end of his term, has become so meek in negotiations with Senator Corker (R-Tenn.) on achieving the kind of reform that will protect the U.S. – as well as the rest of the world – from the kind of massive gambling, lack of corporate oversight, and “get rich quick” schemes that caused the financial crisis.

While the anger at AIG, Fannie and Freddie is justified, few voters really understand how much the government, through Congressional legislation, gives away in corporate welfare in terms of special protections, allowing monopolistic practices, and targeted tax breaks and credits. Trillions of tax dollars are lost through Congressional protections and approved monopolies. Those trillions, in part, are made up by the middle class while the rest goes into the national debt. Meanwhile, voters pay higher prices because protections and monopolies prevent real competition which lower prices…and special regulatory exclusions allow specific industry sectors to gouge American families.

Payday LendersNow, there’s a significant effort under way to exclude various financial companies who make it a practice to prey upon people by charging interest rates so high that, in many cases, the principle can never be paid off. From Wikipedia, “the most frequent rate was $25 per $100, or 650% annual interest rate (APR) [emphasis mine] if the loan is repaid in two weeks.”

Payday lenders, pawnbrokers, car dealers and other companies that make loans but do not hold bank charters would be shielded from the scrutiny of a proposed federal consumer protection regulator under the terms of a tentative compromise between senators who are attempting to craft a bipartisan bill.

Under the proposal, the regulator would hold broad authority to write rules protecting borrowers, but officials would make regular compliance checks only at banks and, for the first time, at mortgage lenders, a step that still would exclude some of the nation’s largest and most controversial lending industries.

The Obama administration has pushed to place nearly all lenders under federal oversight for the first time, but Sen.Senator Bob Corker of TN Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) insisted on limiting the scope of the proposed consumer regulator as a condition of his negotiations over a broader package of regulatory reforms with Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.), the chairman of the banking committee, according to several people familiar with the negotiations.

Republicans argue that there is no reason for increased oversight, at considerable expense, of industries that played no role in the financial crisis.

But the proposed exclusion of those industries has drawn opposition from an unlikely alliance of consumer advocates and banking trade groups, who argue that the government should impose equal stringencies on all lenders, banks and non-banks alike.

“The point of the agency is to provide a cop on the beat that focuses where the problems are, not a cop that’s fenced off from some of the worst actors,” said Elizabeth Warren, a Harvard Law professor who helped to shape the administration’s proposal for the new agency.

Even the Defense Department has chimed in, sending a letter to the Treasury Department urging oversight of auto lenders because of a pattern of abusive lending to military personnel.

“We believe the intervention of the [Consumer Financial Protection Agency] in overseeing auto financing and sales for service members will help protect them and will assist us in reducing the concerns they have over their financial well-being,” Defense Undersecretary Clifford Stanley wrote in a letter dated Feb. 26.

When will Congress choose to stand up for the American people as opposed to protecting businesses who behave badly or engage in monopolistic practices? When will Congress end Corporate Welfare?

Regardless of how much the Republican Party and tea partiers condemn Democrats, it’s the Republican Party which has pushed the hardest to protect corporate interests against the interests of average American people. Worst of all, perhaps, is that the rest of the world, from Europe to Asia and China, are becoming profoundly angry because the U.S. Congress has not only failed to expeditiously resolve the underlying causes that created the global financial collapse but also because they see Congress wavering on doing anything at all that amounts to real reform.

As a side note as to why Sen. Corker may be adverse to extending consumer protections to payday lenders, auto dealers, etc.:

Corker’s state is home to the nation’s third-largest payday lender, Check Into Cash Inc. The company’s chief executive, W. Allan Jones, and his wife have contributed $12,300 to Corker’s Senate campaigns since 2004, $1,000 to Dodd and about $500,000 to federal and state political candidates overall since 1999, the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics said.

In addition, Check Into Cash is a member of the Community Financial Services Assn. of America, a trade group for storefront payday lenders. The group formed a political action committee in 2007 that contributed $168,000 to members of Congress during the 2008 election cycle, including $1,000 apiece to Corker and Dodd.</em

Among those benefiting would be a Tennessee-based company whose officers have been generous campaign contributors to their home-state senator, Bob Corker, the leading Republican negotiator on the legislation.

Executives of Jones Management Services LLC, based in Cleveland, Tennessee, and its loan companies contributed $17,325 to Corker’s 2006 and 2012 Senate campaigns, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a Washington-based research group.

It’s time every member of Congress understood that the voters are sick and tired of corporate giveaways and corporate welfare…and the total failure to protect the American people from usurious practices and overweening greed. If large corporations can’t stand on their own without special tax credits and deductions, perhaps they should change management or rethink their business model. The taxpayers should not be subsidizing them through special tax and regulatory breaks. If companies want to the rights of “people” then they should have to abide the same tax and regulatory rules as the voting public: NO SPECIAL DEALS!

Advertisements

Written by Valerie Curl

March 11, 2010 at 8:45 AM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: